Re: [PATCH v3] watchdog: add driver for Ricoh RN5T618 watchdog

[Wim Van Sebroeck]

Hi Beniamino,

> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:24:11PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > I'm not sure why a) this patch was sent to me in the first place and
> > > > b) why anyone would think this should go in through MFD?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi Lee,
> > > 
> > > from a previous mail [1] I (wrongly) assumed that this was going
> > > through the MFD tree. If this is not the case, Wim, can you pick the
> > > patch?
> > > 
> > > Beniamino
> > > 
> > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/4/124
> > 
> > Okay, I see what's happened.
> > 
> > So actually if there are interdependencies between this and the other
> > patches in the set, which I think there are, then you should have kept
> > this in the set with the others.  Sending as an independent patch is
> > not the correct thing to do.
> > 
> > Can you resend this, as a patch-set with all of the Acks you have
> > acquired please.  I will then take the set as a whole.
> 
> The original series had 4 patches:
> 
> - MFD core support
> - regulator driver
> - watchdog driver
> - dts documentation
> 
> As explained in the submission comment, all patches except watchdog
> one have already been applied (1 and 4 to MFD tree, 2 to
> regulator). Only the watchdog support is missing and it doesn't have
> compilation dependencies to other patches (the watchdog driver can't
> be enabled without the MFD core support).
> 
> Do you want me to resend the entire patchset or should this go in
> through watchdog?

I'll add it to the watchdog tree then.

Kind regads,
Wim.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/