Re: [PATCH 0/4] locktorture: Torture rwlocks

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:14:22AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> We are still missing the ability to torture rwlocks, particularly the
> new queued variant (patch 1). The rest of the patches are miscellaneous
> updates.
> 
> Hopefully the set is straightforward enough that it can still be
> considered for v3.18.

Queued, thank you!

Running a quick set of tests, if these pass, will send a pull request along.

							Thanx, Paul

> Davidlohr Bueso (4):
>   locktorture: Support rwlocks
>   locktorture: Fix __acquire annotation for spinlock irq
>   locktorture: Cannot hold read and write lock
>   locktorture: Cleanup header usage
> 
>  Documentation/locking/locktorture.txt              |   5 +
>  kernel/locking/locktorture.c                       | 141 ++++++++++++++++++---
>  .../selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/CFLIST       |   1 +
>  .../selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK04       |   6 +
>  .../selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK04.boot  |   1 +
>  5 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK04
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/configs/lock/LOCK04.boot
> 
> -- 
> 1.8.4.5
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/