Re: [PATCH 4/4] edac, amd64_edac: Add F15h M60h support

[Borislav Petkov]

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:57:10PM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> This patch adds support for ECC error decoding for F15h M60h processor.
> Aside from the usual changes, the patch adds support for some new features
> in the processor:
>  - DDR4(unbuffered, registered); LRDIMM DDR3 support
>    - relevant debug messages have been modified/added to report these
>      memory types
>  - new dbam_to_cs mappers
>    - if (F15h M60h && LRDIMM); we need a 'multiplier' value to find
>      cs_size. This multiplier value is obtained from the per-dimm
>      DCSM register. So, change the interface to accept a 'cs_mask_nr'
>      value to facilitate this calculation
> Misc cleanup:
>  - amd64_pci_table[] is condensed by using PCI_VDEVICE macro.
> 
> Testing details:
> Tested the patch by injecting 'ECC' type errors using mce_amd_inj
> and error decoding works fine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 226 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h |  12 ++-
>  2 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> index bbd6514..3e265e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> @@ -690,11 +690,32 @@ static void debug_display_dimm_sizes(struct amd64_pvt *, u8);
>  
>  static void debug_dump_dramcfg_low(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u32 dclr, int chan)
>  {
> +	int cs;
> +
>  	edac_dbg(1, "F2x%d90 (DRAM Cfg Low): 0x%08x\n", chan, dclr);
>  
> -	edac_dbg(1, "  DIMM type: %sbuffered; all DIMMs support ECC: %s\n",
> -		 (dclr & BIT(16)) ?  "un" : "",
> -		 (dclr & BIT(19)) ? "yes" : "no");
> +	if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x60) {
> +		for_each_chip_select_mask(cs, chan, pvt) {
> +			u32 dcsm = pvt->csels[chan].csmasks[cs];
> +
> +			if (dcsm & 0x3) {
> +				/* LRDIMMs */
> +				edac_dbg(1, "  DIMM type: LRDIMM %dx rank multiply;"
> +					 "CS = %d; all DIMMs support ECC: %s\n",
> +					 (dcsm & 0x3), cs,
> +					 (dclr & BIT(19)) ? "yes" : "no");

Why do we need to iterate over the DRAM CS sets? Just for the rank
multiplier, apparently. We dump those normally in read_dct_base_mask(),
though.

> +			} else {
> +				edac_dbg(1, "  DIMM type: %sbuffered; CS = %d;"
> +					 "all DIMMs support ECC: %s\n",
> +					 (dclr & BIT(16)) ?  "un" : "", cs,
> +					 (dclr & BIT(19)) ? "yes" : "no");
> +			}
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		edac_dbg(1, "  DIMM type: %sbuffered; all DIMMs support ECC:"
> +			    "%s\n", (dclr & BIT(16)) ?  "un" : "",
> +				    (dclr & BIT(19)) ? "yes" : "no");
> +	}

Single if-else statements don't need {} braces.

>  
>  	edac_dbg(1, "  PAR/ERR parity: %s\n",
>  		 (dclr & BIT(8)) ?  "enabled" : "disabled");
> @@ -756,7 +777,7 @@ static void prep_chip_selects(struct amd64_pvt *pvt)
>  	if (pvt->fam == 0xf && pvt->ext_model < K8_REV_F) {
>  		pvt->csels[0].b_cnt = pvt->csels[1].b_cnt = 8;
>  		pvt->csels[0].m_cnt = pvt->csels[1].m_cnt = 8;
> -	} else if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model >= 0x30) {
> +	} else if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x30) {
>  		pvt->csels[0].b_cnt = pvt->csels[1].b_cnt = 4;
>  		pvt->csels[0].m_cnt = pvt->csels[1].m_cnt = 2;
>  	} else {
> @@ -817,10 +838,26 @@ static enum mem_type determine_memory_type(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, int cs)
>  {
>  	enum mem_type type;
>  
> -	/* F15h supports only DDR3 */
> -	if (pvt->fam >= 0x15)
> -		type = (pvt->dclr0 & BIT(16)) ?	MEM_DDR3 : MEM_RDDR3;
> -	else if (pvt->fam == 0x10 || pvt->ext_model >= K8_REV_F) {
> +	/* F15h, M60h supports DDR4 too*/
> +	if (pvt->fam >= 0x15) {
> +		if (pvt->model == 0x60) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Since in init_csrow we iterate over just DCT0
> +			 * use '0' for dct values here when necessary.
> +			 */
> +			u32 dram_ctrl;
> +			u32 dcsm = pvt->csels[0].csmasks[cs];
> +
> +			amd64_read_dct_pci_cfg(pvt, 0, DRAM_CONTROL,
> +					       &dram_ctrl);

We're reading DRAM_CONTROL at two locations, maybe we should cache it in
pvt->dram_ctl ?

> +			type = (((dram_ctrl >> 8) & 0x7) == 0x2) ? MEM_DDR4 :
> +				(pvt->dclr0 & BIT(16)) ? MEM_DDR3 :
> +				(dcsm & 0x3) ? MEM_LRDDR3 : MEM_RDDR3;

Doesn't D18F2x78_dct[3:0][DramType] define all possible types or do you
have to fallback to DCLR for DDR3 types?

> +		} else {
> +			type = (pvt->dclr0 & BIT(16)) ?	MEM_DDR3 : MEM_RDDR3;
> +		}

Single if-else statements don't need {} braces. Please read
Documentation/CodingStyle.

> +
> +	} else if (pvt->fam == 0x10 || pvt->ext_model >= K8_REV_F) {
>  		if (pvt->dchr0 & DDR3_MODE)
>  			type = (pvt->dclr0 & BIT(16)) ?	MEM_DDR3 : MEM_RDDR3;
>  		else
> @@ -958,8 +995,12 @@ static void read_dram_base_limit_regs(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned range)
>  	if (WARN_ON(!nb))
>  		return;
>  
> -	pci_func = (pvt->model == 0x30) ? PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F1
> -					: PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_NB_F1;
> +	if (pvt->model == 0x60)
> +		pci_func = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M60H_NB_F1;
> +	else if (pvt->model == 0x30)
> +		pci_func = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F1;
> +	else
> +		pci_func = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_NB_F1;
>  
>  	f1 = pci_get_related_function(nb->misc->vendor, pci_func, nb->misc);
>  	if (WARN_ON(!f1))
> @@ -1049,7 +1090,7 @@ static int ddr2_cs_size(unsigned i, bool dct_width)
>  }
>  
>  static int k8_dbam_to_chip_select(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
> -				  unsigned cs_mode)
> +				  unsigned cs_mode, int cs_mask_nr)
>  {
>  	u32 dclr = dct ? pvt->dclr1 : pvt->dclr0;
>  
> @@ -1167,8 +1208,43 @@ static int ddr3_cs_size(unsigned i, bool dct_width)
>  	return cs_size;
>  }
>  
> +static int ddr3_lrdimm_cs_size(unsigned i, unsigned rank_multiply)
> +{
> +	unsigned shift = 0;
> +	int cs_size = 0;
> +
> +	if (i < 4 || i == 6)
> +		cs_size = -1;
> +	else if (i == 12)
> +		shift = 7;
> +	else if (!(i & 0x1))
> +		shift = i >> 1;
> +	else
> +		shift = (i + 1) >> 1;
> +
> +	if (cs_size != -1)
> +		cs_size = rank_multiply * (128 << shift);
> +
> +	return cs_size;
> +}
> +
> +static int ddr4_cs_size(unsigned i)
> +{
> +	int cs_size = 0;
> +
> +	if (i == 0)
> +		cs_size = -1;
> +	else if (i == 1)
> +		cs_size = 1024;
> +	else
> +		/* Min cs_size = 1G */
> +		cs_size = 1024 * (1 << (i >> 1));
> +
> +	return cs_size;
> +}
> +
>  static int f10_dbam_to_chip_select(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
> -				   unsigned cs_mode)
> +				   unsigned cs_mode, int cs_mask_nr)
>  {
>  	u32 dclr = dct ? pvt->dclr1 : pvt->dclr0;
>  
> @@ -1184,18 +1260,56 @@ static int f10_dbam_to_chip_select(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
>   * F15h supports only 64bit DCT interfaces
>   */
>  static int f15_dbam_to_chip_select(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
> -				   unsigned cs_mode)
> +				   unsigned cs_mode, int cs_mask_nr)
>  {
>  	WARN_ON(cs_mode > 12);
>  
>  	return ddr3_cs_size(cs_mode, false);
>  }
>  
> +/* F15h M60h supports DDR4 mapping as well.. */
> +static int f15_m60h_dbam_to_chip_select(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
> +					unsigned cs_mode, int cs_mask_nr)
> +{
> +	int cs_size;
> +	enum mem_type type;
> +	u32 dram_ctrl;
> +	u32 dcsm = pvt->csels[dct].csmasks[cs_mask_nr];
> +
> +	WARN_ON(cs_mode > 12);
> +
> +	amd64_read_dct_pci_cfg(pvt, dct, DRAM_CONTROL, &dram_ctrl);
> +	type = (((dram_ctrl >> 8) & 0x7) == 0x2) ? MEM_DDR4 :
> +		(pvt->dclr0 & BIT(16)) ? MEM_DDR3 :
> +		(dcsm & 0x3) ? MEM_LRDDR3 : MEM_RDDR3;

This is the second time we're determining memory type, maybe we should
cache that too into pvt->dram_type...?

> +
> +	if (type == MEM_DDR4) {
> +		if (cs_mode > 9)
> +			return -1;
> +
> +		cs_size = ddr4_cs_size(cs_mode);
> +	} else if (type == MEM_LRDDR3) {
> +		unsigned rank_multiply = dcsm & 0xf;
> +
> +		if (rank_multiply == 3)
> +			rank_multiply = 4;
> +		cs_size = ddr3_lrdimm_cs_size(cs_mode, rank_multiply);
> +	} else {
> +		/* Minimum cs size is 512mb for F15hM60h*/
> +		if (cs_mode == 0x1)
> +			return -1;
> +
> +		cs_size = ddr3_cs_size(cs_mode, false);
> +	}
> +
> +	return cs_size;
> +}

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/