Re: [rfcomm_run] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 79 at kernel/sched/core.c:7156 __might_sleep()

From: Peter Hurley
Date: Thu Oct 02 2014 - 08:38:57 EST


On 10/02/2014 08:31 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 01:09:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:02:28PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> We possibly find a rfcomm bug (maintainers CCed) exposed by your debug patch
>>>
>>> [ 1.861895] NET: Registered protocol family 5
>>> [ 1.862978] Bluetooth: RFCOMM TTY layer initialized
>>> [ 1.863099] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [ 1.863105] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 79 at kernel/sched/core.c:7156 __might_sleep+0x17d/0x1a1()
>>> [ 1.863112] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=1 set at [<c14dc381>] rfcomm_run+0xdf/0x130e
>>> [ 1.863591] [<c1058b73>] ? kthread_stop+0x53/0x53
>>> [ 1.864906] [<c155a411>] dump_stack+0x48/0x60
>>> [ 1.866298] [<c14dc381>] ? rfcomm_run+0xdf/0x130e
>>
>> Ha yes, rfcomm_run is a complete buggy mess indeed. Lemme go see what I
>> can make of it.
>
> ---
> Subject: rfcomm: Fix broken wait construct
>
> rfcomm_run() is a tad broken in that is has a nested wait loop. One
> cannot rely on p->state for the outer wait because the inner wait will
> overwrite it.
>
> While at it, rename rfcomm_schedule to rfcomm_wake, since that is what
> it actually does.

rfcomm_schedule() as in schedule_work(), which is how it's used.

Regards,
Peter Hurley

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/