Re: [v3, 08/16] powerpc/powerpc: Add new PCIe functions for allocating cxl interrupts

From: Michael Ellerman
Date: Tue Oct 07 2014 - 18:59:12 EST


On Tue, 2014-07-10 at 10:48:14 UTC, Michael Neuling wrote:
> From: Ian Munsie <imunsie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This adds a number of functions for allocating IRQs under powernv PCIe for cxl.
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
> index baf3de6..3b67010b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
> #include <asm/debug.h>
> #include <asm/firmware.h>
>
> +#include <misc/cxl.h>

You should be including pnv-pci.h here.

Otherwise the header and the implementation could get out of sync, it will also
fix these:

arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c:1365:5: warning: symbol 'pnv_phb_to_cxl' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c:1389:5: warning: symbol 'pnv_cxl_alloc_hwirqs' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c:1404:6: warning: symbol 'pnv_cxl_release_hwirqs' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c:1413:6: warning: symbol 'pnv_cxl_release_hwirq_ranges' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c:1433:5: warning: symbol 'pnv_cxl_alloc_hwirq_ranges' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c:1470:5: warning: symbol 'pnv_cxl_get_irq_count' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c:1479:5: warning: symbol 'pnv_cxl_ioda_msi_setup' was not declared. Should it be static?

cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/