Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] usb: dwc3: enable usb suspend phy

From: Felipe Balbi
Date: Fri Oct 17 2014 - 14:48:42 EST


Hi,

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 06:41:04PM +0000, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:balbi@xxxxxx]
> > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 8:00 AM
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 04:53:41PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> > > AMD NL needs to suspend usb3 ss phy, but this doesn't enable on simulation
> > > board.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-pci.c | 3 ++-
> > > drivers/usb/dwc3/platform_data.h | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > > index 3ccfe41..4a98696 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c
> > > @@ -395,6 +395,9 @@ static void dwc3_phy_setup(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> > > if (dwc->quirks & DWC3_QUIRK_TX_DEEPH)
> > > reg |= DWC3_GUSB3PIPECTL_TX_DEEPH(1);
> > >
> > > + if (dwc->quirks & DWC3_QUIRK_SUSPHY)
> >
> > should be:
> >
> > if (!dwc->suspend_usb3_phy_quirk)
> >
> > > + reg |= DWC3_GUSB3PIPECTL_SUSPHY;
> >
> > IIRC, databook asks us to set that bit anyway, so the quirk is disabling
> > that bit. Am I missing something ? Paul ?
>
> It looks to me that Huang's patch is enabling that bit, not disabling
> it.

right, but that's what's actually quirky right ? IIRC, Databook asks us
to set usb2 and usb3 suspend phy bits and we're just not doing it.

> Currently the driver does not set either DWC3_GUSB3PIPECTL_SUSPHY or
> DWC3_GUSB2PHYCFG_SUSPHY (unless it has been added by that big patch
> series you just posted). According to the databook, both of those
> bits should be set to 1 after the core initialization has completed.

there you go. So unless that quirk bit flag is set, we're safe of
setting SUSPHY bit for everybody.

> So I think the driver should be changed to enable both of those by
> default, and then maybe you want quirks to disable them if there is
> some platform out there which needs that.

Yeah, that's what I thought too :-) Thanks for confirming

--
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature