Re: [PATCH][STABLE] audit: correct AUDIT_GET_FEATURE return message type

[Richard Guy Briggs]

On 14/10/29, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 14/10/29, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:35:06AM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > When an AUDIT_GET_FEATURE message is sent from userspace to the kernel, it
> > > should reply with a message tagged as an AUDIT_GET_FEATURE type with a struct
> > > audit_feature.  The current reply is a message tagged as an AUDIT_GET
> > > type with a struct audit_feature.
> > > 
> > > This appears to have been a cut-and-paste-eo in commit b0fed40.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v3.13-rc1
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/audit.c |    2 +-
> > >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Why did you send this directly to stable@vger?  That's not how to get a
> > patch into the stable kernel trees...
> 
> Sorry, you're right.  It should be accepted upstream first.  I'll go
> back and make sure that gets done...

Wait, it is upstream in v3.18-rc1, commit 9ef9151

Forgot the Cc: to stable in that commit log.

> - RGB

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/