Re: [PATCH 3.2 019/102] xfs: don't dirty buffers beyond EOF

From: Dave Chinner
Date: Tue Nov 04 2014 - 02:09:23 EST


On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 10:28:03PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2.64-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

I'm not sure it's a good idea to pull stuff like this back into
really old stable kernels. This was part of a much larger series of
bug fixes that were fairly carefully tested. I very much doubt that
there is specific XFS test coverage on these older kernels that
would determine if this has introduced problems or not....
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> commit 22e757a49cf010703fcb9c9b4ef793248c39b0c2 upstream.
>
> generic/263 is failing fsx at this point with a page spanning
> EOF that cannot be invalidated. The operations are:
>
> 1190 mapwrite 0x52c00 thru 0x5e569 (0xb96a bytes)
> 1191 mapread 0x5c000 thru 0x5d636 (0x1637 bytes)
> 1192 write 0x5b600 thru 0x771ff (0x1bc00 bytes)

I've got no idea whether generic/263 even exposes this problem
on 3.2 kernels, or whether there's a bunch of the other upstream
changes that need to be added first to expose it... :/

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/