[PATCH v4 3/6] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Remove unwanted reg_se_cache save

From: Vignesh R
Date: Fri Nov 14 2014 - 00:41:26 EST


In one shot mode, sequencer automatically disables all enabled steps at
the end of each cycle. (both ADC steps and TSC steps) Hence these steps
need not be saved in reg_se_cache for clearing these steps at a later
stage.
Also, when ADC wakes up Sequencer should not be busy executing any of the
config steps except for the charge step. Previously charge step was 1 ADC
clock cycle and hence it was ignored.

Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c | 7 +++++--
include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
index d877e777cce6..110038859a8d 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
@@ -86,8 +86,12 @@ static void am335x_tscadc_need_adc(struct ti_tscadc_dev *tsadc)
spin_lock_irq(&tsadc->reg_lock);
finish_wait(&tsadc->reg_se_wait, &wait);

+ /*
+ * Sequencer should either be idle or
+ * busy applying the charge step.
+ */
reg = tscadc_readl(tsadc, REG_ADCFSM);
- WARN_ON(reg & SEQ_STATUS);
+ WARN_ON((reg & SEQ_STATUS) && !(reg & CHARGE_STEP));
tsadc->adc_waiting = false;
}
tsadc->adc_in_use = true;
@@ -96,7 +100,6 @@ static void am335x_tscadc_need_adc(struct ti_tscadc_dev *tsadc)
void am335x_tsc_se_set_once(struct ti_tscadc_dev *tsadc, u32 val)
{
spin_lock_irq(&tsadc->reg_lock);
- tsadc->reg_se_cache |= val;
am335x_tscadc_need_adc(tsadc);

tscadc_writel(tsadc, REG_SE, val);
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h b/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h
index 3f4e994ace2b..1fd50dcfe47c 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@

/* Sequencer Status */
#define SEQ_STATUS BIT(5)
+#define CHARGE_STEP 0x11

#define ADC_CLK 3000000
#define TOTAL_STEPS 16
--
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/