Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add lightweight memory barriers fast_rmb() and fast_wmb()

[Alexander Duyck]

On 11/18/2014 01:57 AM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck
> > These patches introduce two new primitives for synchronizing cache-enabled
> > memory writes and reads.  These two new primitives are:
> >
> > 	fast_rmb()
> > 	fast_wmb()
> Not sure I like the names.
> If the aim is to sync data into the local cache so that hardware
> that is doing cache-snooping accesses sees the data then maybe
> 	local_rmb() and local_wmb()

Yeah, that is the general consensus.  I am planning to change them to 
coherent_rmb() and coherent_wmb().

> IIRC read_barrier_depends() is a nop on everything except alpha.
> Maybe add the default if it isn't defined by the MD file?
>
> 	David
>   

From my patch the only two I saw define it were alpha and blackfin. It 
is already defined in asm-generic, the rest is just clean-up since I 
suspect some of the arch tree barrier.h calls just borrowed from 
asm-generic without sorting out what became redundancies.

Thanks,

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/