Re: thunderbolt: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function call "ring_free"

From: SF Markus Elfring
Date: Fri Nov 21 2014 - 07:22:00 EST

> ring_free does not check for null:
> Maybe your software confuses the method with:

Thanks for your feedback.

I am sorry for a bit of confusion here.

1. Would it make sense that a variant for the thunderbolt ring_free()
function will also perform input parameter validation?

2. Are any additional prefixes appropriate so that further name space
conflicts can be better avoided?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at