Re: [PATCH] ipc,sem block sem_lock on sma->lock during sma initialization
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Nov 21 2014 - 15:09:35 EST
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:52:26 -0500 Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When manipulating just one semaphore with semop, sem_lock only takes that
> single semaphore's lock. This creates a problem during initialization of
> the semaphore array, when the data structures used by sem_lock have not
> been set up yet. The sma->lock is already held by newary, and we just
> have to make sure everything else waits on that lock during initialization.
> Luckily it is easy to make sem_lock wait on the sma->lock, by pretending
> there is a complex operation in progress while the sma is being initialized.
> The newary function already zeroes sma->complex_count before unlocking
> the sma->lock.
What are the runtime effects of the bug?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/