Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] sched: make scale_rt invariant with frequency

From: Wanpeng Li
Date: Mon Nov 24 2014 - 21:24:54 EST


Hi Vincent,
On 11/4/14, 12:54 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
The average running time of RT tasks is used to estimate the remaining compute
capacity for CFS tasks. This remaining capacity is the original capacity scaled
down by a factor (aka scale_rt_capacity). This estimation of available capacity
must also be invariant with frequency scaling.

A frequency scaling factor is applied on the running time of the RT tasks for
computing scale_rt_capacity.

In sched_rt_avg_update, we scale the RT execution time like below:
rq->rt_avg += rt_delta * arch_scale_freq_capacity() >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT

Then, scale_rt_capacity can be summarized by:
scale_rt_capacity = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE -
((rq->rt_avg << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT) / period)

The 'period' aka 'total' in the scale_rt_capacity(), why it is sched_avg_period() + delta instead of sched_avg_period()?

Regards,
Wanpeng Li


We can optimize by removing right and left shift in the computation of rq->rt_avg
and scale_rt_capacity

The call to arch_scale_frequency_capacity in the rt scheduling path might be
a concern for RT folks because I'm not sure whether we can rely on
arch_scale_freq_capacity to be short and efficient ?

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 17 +++++------------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a5039da..b37c27b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5785,7 +5785,7 @@ unsigned long __weak arch_scale_cpu_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
static unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(int cpu)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- u64 total, available, age_stamp, avg;
+ u64 total, used, age_stamp, avg;
s64 delta;
/*
@@ -5801,19 +5801,12 @@ static unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(int cpu)
total = sched_avg_period() + delta;
- if (unlikely(total < avg)) {
- /* Ensures that capacity won't end up being negative */
- available = 0;
- } else {
- available = total - avg;
- }
+ used = div_u64(avg, total);
- if (unlikely((s64)total < SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE))
- total = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
+ if (likely(used < SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE))
+ return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE - used;
- total >>= SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
-
- return div_u64(available, total);
+ return 1;
}
static void update_cpu_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index c34bd11..fc5b152 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1312,9 +1312,11 @@ static inline int hrtick_enabled(struct rq *rq)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
extern void sched_avg_update(struct rq *rq);
+extern unsigned long arch_scale_freq_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu);
+
static inline void sched_rt_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 rt_delta)
{
- rq->rt_avg += rt_delta;
+ rq->rt_avg += rt_delta * arch_scale_freq_capacity(NULL, cpu_of(rq));
sched_avg_update(rq);
}
#else

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/