Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Use CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME in core code

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, November 27, 2014 11:34:03 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
> 
> > That said whether or not it is ever useful to set PM_RUNTIME alone is a good
> > question.  In my opinion it is useful today, at least on some platforms that
> > don't really support system suspend or hibernation in any form.  However, it
> > may not be the case any more when suspend-to-idle becomes mature enough,
> > because that should just work for any platform without any kind of special
> > support.  We're still missing some timekeeping bits there, but once that
> > gap has been covered, we may just eliminate PM_SLEEP as well if there's a
> > broad consensus on that.
> 
> That's sounds like a good approach, thanks for sharing your ideas and plans.
> 
> Feel free to add my reviewed-by tag to this patchset as well.

I'll do that, thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/