Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] GMAC: add driver for Rockchip RK3288 SoCs integrated GMAC

From: Heiko Stübner
Date: Mon Dec 01 2014 - 18:40:49 EST


Hi Roger,

the comments inline are a rough first review. I hope to get a clearer picture
for the stuff I'm not sure about in v3 once the big issues are fixed.


Am Donnerstag, 27. November 2014, 10:52:08 schrieb Roger Chen:
> This driver is based on stmmac driver.
>
> modification based on Giuseppe CAVALLARO's suggestion:
> 1. use BIT()
>
> > +/*RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON3*/
> > +#define GMAC_TXCLK_DLY_ENABLE ((0x4000 << 16) | (0x4000))
> > +#define GMAC_TXCLK_DLY_DISABLE ((0x4000 << 16) | (0x0000))
>
> ...
>
> why do not use BIT and BIT_MASK where possible?
>
> ===>after modification:
>
> #define GRF_BIT(nr) (BIT(nr) | BIT(nr+16))
> #define GRF_CLR_BIT(nr) (BIT(nr+16))
> #define GMAC_TXCLK_DLY_ENABLE GRF_BIT(14)
> #define GMAC_TXCLK_DLY_DISABLE GRF_CLR_BIT(14)
> ...
> 2.
>
> > + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
> > + GMAC_PHY_INTF_SEL_RGMII);
> > + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
> > + GMAC_RMII_MODE_CLR);
>
> maybe you could perform just one write unless there is some HW
> constraint.
>
> ===>after modification:
>
> regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
> GMAC_PHY_INTF_SEL_RGMII | GMAC_RMII_MODE_CLR);
>
> 3. use macros
>
> > + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_GPIO3D_E, 0xFFFFFFFF);
> > + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_GPIO4B_E,
> > + 0x3<<2<<16 | 0x3<<2);
>
> pls use macros, these shift sequence is really help to decode
>
> ===>after modification:
>
> regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_GPIO4A_E, GPIO4A_12MA);
> regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_GPIO4B_E, GPIO4B_2_12MA);
>
> 4. remove grf fail check in rk_gmac_setup()
>
> > + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf))
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing rockchip,grf property\n");
>
> I wonder if you can fail on here and save all the check in
> set_rgmii_speed etc.
> Maybe this can be considered a mandatory property for the glue-logic.
>
> 5. remove .tx_coe=1
>
> > +const struct stmmac_of_data rk_gmac_data = {
> > + .has_gmac = 1,
> > + .tx_coe = 1,
>
> FYI, on new gmac there is the HW capability register to dinamically
> provide you if coe is supported.
>
> IMO you should add the OF "compatible" string and in case of mac
> newer than the 3.50a you can remove coe.

changelogs like these, should be compact and also not be in the commit message
itself, but in the "comment"-section below the "---" and before the diffstat.


>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Chen <roger.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

changelog here ... the commonly used pattern is something like

changes since v2:
- ...
- ...

changes since v1:
- ...

> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c | 636
> ++++++++++++++++++++ .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c |
> 3 +
> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 641 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile index ac4d562..73c2715
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ stmmac-objs:= stmmac_main.o stmmac_ethtool.o stmmac_mdio.o
> ring_mode.o \
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_STMMAC_PLATFORM) += stmmac-platform.o
> stmmac-platform-objs:= stmmac_platform.o dwmac-meson.o dwmac-sunxi.o \
> - dwmac-sti.o dwmac-socfpga.o
> + dwmac-sti.o dwmac-socfpga.o dwmac-rk.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_STMMAC_PCI) += stmmac-pci.o
> stmmac-pci-objs:= stmmac_pci.o
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..870563f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,636 @@
> +/**
> + * dwmac-rk.c - Rockchip RK3288 DWMAC specific glue layer
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Chen-Zhi (Roger Chen)
> + *
> + * Chen-Zhi (Roger Chen) <roger.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/stmmac.h>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/phy.h>
> +#include <linux/of_net.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +
> +struct rk_priv_data {
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> + int phy_iface;
> + bool power_ctrl_by_pmu;
> + char pmu_regulator[32];
> + int pmu_enable_level;
> +
> + int power_io;
> + int power_io_level;
> + int reset_io;
> + int reset_io_level;
> + int phyirq_io;
> + int phyirq_io_level;
> +
> + bool clk_enabled;
> + bool clock_input;
> +
> + struct clk *clk_mac;
> + struct clk *clk_mac_pll;
> + struct clk *gmac_clkin;
> + struct clk *mac_clk_rx;
> + struct clk *mac_clk_tx;
> + struct clk *clk_mac_ref;
> + struct clk *clk_mac_refout;
> + struct clk *aclk_mac;
> + struct clk *pclk_mac;
> +
> + int tx_delay;
> + int rx_delay;
> +
> + struct regmap *grf;
> +};
> +
> +#define RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1 0x0248
> +#define RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON3 0x0250
> +#define RK3288_GRF_GPIO3D_E 0x01ec
> +#define RK3288_GRF_GPIO4A_E 0x01f0
> +#define RK3288_GRF_GPIO4B_E 0x01f4

here you're using a space instead of a tab, please select one pattern either
tabs or space but do not mix them.


> +#define GPIO3D_2MA 0xFFFF0000
> +#define GPIO3D_4MA 0xFFFF5555
> +#define GPIO3D_8MA 0xFFFFAAAA
> +#define GPIO3D_12MA 0xFFFFFFFF
> +
> +#define GPIO4A_2MA 0xFFFF0000
> +#define GPIO4A_4MA 0xFFFF5555
> +#define GPIO4A_8MA 0xFFFFAAAA
> +#define GPIO4A_12MA 0xFFFFFFFF

see comment about pin settings below


> +
> +#define GRF_BIT(nr) (BIT(nr) | BIT(nr+16))
> +#define GRF_CLR_BIT(nr) (BIT(nr+16))
> +
> +#define GPIO4B_2_2MA (GRF_CLR_BIT(2) | GRF_CLR_BIT(3))
> +#define GPIO4B_2_4MA (GRF_BIT(2) | GRF_CLR_BIT(3))
> +#define GPIO4B_2_8MA (GRF_CLR_BIT(2) | GRF_BIT(3))
> +#define GPIO4B_2_12MA (GRF_BIT(2) | GRF_BIT(3))
> +
> +/*RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1*/
> +#define GMAC_PHY_INTF_SEL_RGMII (GRF_BIT(6) | GRF_CLR_BIT(7) |
> GRF_CLR_BIT(8))
> +#define GMAC_PHY_INTF_SEL_RMII (GRF_CLR_BIT(6) |
> GRF_CLR_BIT(7) | GRF_BIT(8))
> +#define GMAC_FLOW_CTRL GRF_BIT(9)
> +#define GMAC_FLOW_CTRL_CLR GRF_CLR_BIT(9)
> +#define GMAC_SPEED_10M GRF_CLR_BIT(10)
> +#define GMAC_SPEED_100M GRF_BIT(10)
> +#define GMAC_RMII_CLK_25M GRF_BIT(11)
> +#define GMAC_RMII_CLK_2_5M GRF_CLR_BIT(11)
> +#define GMAC_CLK_125M (GRF_CLR_BIT(12) | GRF_CLR_BIT(13))
> +#define GMAC_CLK_25M (GRF_BIT(12) | GRF_BIT(13))
> +#define GMAC_CLK_2_5M (GRF_CLR_BIT(12) | GRF_BIT(13))
> +#define GMAC_RMII_MODE GRF_BIT(14)
> +#define GMAC_RMII_MODE_CLR GRF_CLR_BIT(14)
> +
> +/*RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON3*/
> +#define GMAC_TXCLK_DLY_ENABLE GRF_BIT(14)
> +#define GMAC_TXCLK_DLY_DISABLE GRF_CLR_BIT(14)
> +#define GMAC_RXCLK_DLY_ENABLE GRF_BIT(15)
> +#define GMAC_RXCLK_DLY_DISABLE GRF_CLR_BIT(15)
> +#define GMAC_CLK_RX_DL_CFG(val) ((0x7F<<7<<16) | (val<<7))
> +#define GMAC_CLK_TX_DL_CFG(val) ((0x7F<<16) | (val))

again mixed tabs and spaces as delimiters.

Also the _CFG macros are not well abstracted. You could take a look at the
HIWORD_UPDATE macro in drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h:

#define GMAC_CLK_DL_MASK 0x7f
#define GMAC_CLK_RX_DL_CFG(val) HIWORD_UPDATE(val, GMAC_CLK_DL_MASK, 7)
#define GMAC_CLK_TX_DL_CFG(val) HIWORD_UPDATE(val, GMAC_CLK_DL_MASK, 0)


> +
> +static void set_to_rgmii(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv,
> + int tx_delay, int rx_delay)
> +{
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf)) {
> + pr_err("%s: Missing rockchip,grf property\n", __func__);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
> + GMAC_PHY_INTF_SEL_RGMII | GMAC_RMII_MODE_CLR);
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON3,
> + GMAC_RXCLK_DLY_ENABLE | GMAC_TXCLK_DLY_ENABLE |
> + GMAC_CLK_RX_DL_CFG(rx_delay) |
> + GMAC_CLK_TX_DL_CFG(tx_delay));
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_GPIO3D_E, GPIO3D_12MA);
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_GPIO4A_E, GPIO4A_12MA);
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_GPIO4B_E, GPIO4B_2_12MA);

please don't write to parts controlled by other drivers - here the drive
strength settings of pins is controlled by the pinctrl driver. Instead you can
just set the drive-strength in the pinctrl settings.


> +
> + pr_debug("%s: tx delay=0x%x; rx delay=0x%x;\n",
> + __func__, tx_delay, rx_delay);
> +}
> +
> +static void set_to_rmii(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv)
> +{
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf)) {
> + pr_err("%s: Missing rockchip,grf property\n", __func__);

you have a device-reference in rk_priv_data, so you could use dev_err here.
Same for all other pr_err/pr_debug/pr_* calls in this file.


> + return;
> + }
> +
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
> + GMAC_PHY_INTF_SEL_RMII);
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
> + GMAC_RMII_MODE);

these two could be combined?


> +}
> +
> +static void set_rgmii_speed(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, int speed)
> +{
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf)) {
> + pr_err("%s: Missing rockchip,grf property\n", __func__);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (speed == 10)
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1, GMAC_CLK_2_5M);
> + else if (speed == 100)
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1, GMAC_CLK_25M);
> + else if (speed == 1000)
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1, GMAC_CLK_125M);
> + else
> + pr_err("unknown speed value for RGMII! speed=%d", speed);
> +}
> +
> +static void set_rmii_speed(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, int speed)
> +{
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->grf)) {
> + pr_err("%s: Missing rockchip,grf property\n", __func__);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (speed == 10) {
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
> + GMAC_RMII_CLK_2_5M);
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
> + GMAC_SPEED_10M);

combine into one write?


> + } else if (speed == 100) {
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
> + GMAC_RMII_CLK_25M);
> + regmap_write(bsp_priv->grf, RK3288_GRF_SOC_CON1,
> + GMAC_SPEED_100M);

combine into one write?


> + } else {
> + pr_err("unknown speed value for RMII! speed=%d", speed);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +#define MAC_CLK_RX "mac_clk_rx"
> +#define MAC_CLK_TX "mac_clk_tx"
> +#define CLK_MAC_REF "clk_mac_ref"
> +#define CLK_MAC_REF_OUT "clk_mac_refout"
> +#define CLK_MAC_PLL "clk_mac_pll"
> +#define ACLK_MAC "aclk_mac"
> +#define PCLK_MAC "pclk_mac"
> +#define MAC_CLKIN "ext_gmac"
> +#define CLK_MAC "stmmaceth"

why the need to extra constants for the clock names and not use the real names
directly like most other drivers do?


> +
> +static int gmac_clk_init(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &bsp_priv->pdev->dev;
> +
> + bsp_priv->clk_enabled = false;
> +
> + bsp_priv->mac_clk_rx = clk_get(dev, MAC_CLK_RX);
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->mac_clk_rx))
> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
> + __func__, MAC_CLK_RX);
> +
> + bsp_priv->mac_clk_tx = clk_get(dev, MAC_CLK_TX);
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->mac_clk_tx))
> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
> + __func__, MAC_CLK_TX);
> +
> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_ref = clk_get(dev, CLK_MAC_REF);
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_ref))
> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
> + __func__, CLK_MAC_REF);
> +
> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_refout = clk_get(dev, CLK_MAC_REF_OUT);
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_refout))
> + pr_warn("%s: warning:cannot get clock %s\n",
> + __func__, CLK_MAC_REF_OUT);
> +
> + bsp_priv->aclk_mac = clk_get(dev, ACLK_MAC);
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->aclk_mac))
> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
> + __func__, ACLK_MAC);
> +
> + bsp_priv->pclk_mac = clk_get(dev, PCLK_MAC);
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->pclk_mac))
> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
> + __func__, PCLK_MAC);
> +
> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_pll = clk_get(dev, CLK_MAC_PLL);
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_pll))
> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
> + __func__, CLK_MAC_PLL);
> +
> + bsp_priv->gmac_clkin = clk_get(dev, MAC_CLKIN);
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->gmac_clkin))
> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
> + __func__, MAC_CLKIN);
> +
> + bsp_priv->clk_mac = clk_get(dev, CLK_MAC);
> + if (IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac))
> + pr_warn("%s: warning: cannot get clock %s\n",
> + __func__, CLK_MAC);

there is not clk_put in the _remove case ... maybe you could simply use
devm_clk_get here so that all clocks are put on device removal.

Also you're warning on every missing clock. Below it looks like you need a
different set of them for rgmii and rmii, so maybe you should simply error out
when core clocks for the selected phy-mode are missing.


> +
> + if (bsp_priv->clock_input) {
> + pr_info("%s: clock input from PHY\n", __func__);
> + } else {
> + if (bsp_priv->phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII)
> + clk_set_rate(bsp_priv->clk_mac_pll, 50000000);
> +
> + clk_set_parent(bsp_priv->clk_mac, bsp_priv->clk_mac_pll);

why the explicit reparenting. The common clock-framework is intelligent enough
to select the best suitable parent.

In general I'm thinking the clock-handling inside this driver should be
simplyfied, as the common-clock framework can handle most cases itself. I.e. if
a 125MHz external clock is present and so on. But haven't looked to deep yet.



> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int gmac_clk_enable(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
> +{
> + int phy_iface = phy_iface = bsp_priv->phy_iface;
> +
> + if (enable) {
> + if (!bsp_priv->clk_enabled) {
> + if (phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII) {
> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->mac_clk_rx))
> + clk_prepare_enable(
> + bsp_priv->mac_clk_rx);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_ref))
> + clk_prepare_enable(
> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_ref);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_refout))
> + clk_prepare_enable(
> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_refout);
> + }
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->aclk_mac))
> + clk_prepare_enable(bsp_priv->aclk_mac);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->pclk_mac))
> + clk_prepare_enable(bsp_priv->pclk_mac);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->mac_clk_tx))
> + clk_prepare_enable(bsp_priv->mac_clk_tx);
> +
> + /**
> + * if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac))
> + * clk_prepare_enable(bsp_priv->clk_mac);
> + */
> + mdelay(5);
> + bsp_priv->clk_enabled = true;
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (bsp_priv->clk_enabled) {
> + if (phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII) {
> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->mac_clk_rx))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(
> + bsp_priv->mac_clk_rx);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_ref))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(
> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_ref);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac_refout))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(
> + bsp_priv->clk_mac_refout);
> + }
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->aclk_mac))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(bsp_priv->aclk_mac);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->pclk_mac))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(bsp_priv->pclk_mac);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->mac_clk_tx))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(bsp_priv->mac_clk_tx);
> + /**
> + * if (!IS_ERR(bsp_priv->clk_mac))
> + * clk_disable_unprepare(bsp_priv->clk_mac);
> + */
> + bsp_priv->clk_enabled = false;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int power_on_by_pmu(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
> +{
> + struct regulator *ldo;
> + char *ldostr = bsp_priv->pmu_regulator;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!ldostr) {
> + pr_err("%s: no ldo found\n", __func__);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + ldo = regulator_get(NULL, ldostr);
> + if (!ldo) {
> + pr_err("\n%s get ldo %s failed\n", __func__, ldostr);
> + } else {
> + if (enable) {
> + if (!regulator_is_enabled(ldo)) {
> + regulator_set_voltage(ldo, 3300000, 3300000);
> + ret = regulator_enable(ldo);
> + if (ret != 0)
> + pr_err("%s: fail to enable %s\n",
> + __func__, ldostr);
> + else
> + pr_info("turn on ldo done.\n");
> + } else {
> + pr_warn("%s is enabled before enable", ldostr);
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (regulator_is_enabled(ldo)) {
> + ret = regulator_disable(ldo);
> + if (ret != 0)
> + pr_err("%s: fail to disable %s\n",
> + __func__, ldostr);
> + else
> + pr_info("turn off ldo done.\n");
> + } else {
> + pr_warn("%s is disabled before disable",
> + ldostr);
> + }
> + }
> + regulator_put(ldo);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int power_on_by_gpio(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
> +{
> + if (enable) {
> + /*power on*/
> + if (gpio_is_valid(bsp_priv->power_io))
> + gpio_direction_output(bsp_priv->power_io,
> + bsp_priv->power_io_level);
> + } else {
> + /*power off*/
> + if (gpio_is_valid(bsp_priv->power_io))
> + gpio_direction_output(bsp_priv->power_io,
> + !bsp_priv->power_io_level);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int phy_power_on(struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv, bool enable)
> +{
> + int ret = -1;
> +
> + pr_info("Ethernet PHY power %s\n", enable == 1 ? "on" : "off");
> +
> + if (bsp_priv->power_ctrl_by_pmu)
> + ret = power_on_by_pmu(bsp_priv, enable);
> + else
> + ret = power_on_by_gpio(bsp_priv, enable);

this looks wrong. This should always be a regulator. Even a regulator + switch
controlled by a gpio can still be modelled as regulator, so that you don't
need this switch and assorted special handling - so just use the regulator API


> +
> + if (enable) {
> + /*reset*/
> + if (gpio_is_valid(bsp_priv->reset_io)) {
> + gpio_direction_output(bsp_priv->reset_io,
> + bsp_priv->reset_io_level);
> + mdelay(5);
> + gpio_direction_output(bsp_priv->reset_io,
> + !bsp_priv->reset_io_level);
> + }
> + mdelay(30);
> +
> + } else {
> + /*pull down reset*/
> + if (gpio_is_valid(bsp_priv->reset_io)) {
> + gpio_direction_output(bsp_priv->reset_io,
> + bsp_priv->reset_io_level);
> + }
> + }

I'm not sure yet if it would be better to use the reset framework for this.
While it says it is also meant for reset-gpios, there does not seem a driver
for this to exist yet.



> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +#define GPIO_PHY_POWER "gmac_phy_power"
> +#define GPIO_PHY_RESET "gmac_phy_reset"
> +#define GPIO_PHY_IRQ "gmac_phy_irq"

again I don't understand why these constants are necessary

> +
> +static void *rk_gmac_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + enum of_gpio_flags flags;
> + int ret;
> + const char *strings = NULL;
> + int value;
> + int irq;
> +
> + bsp_priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*bsp_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!bsp_priv)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + bsp_priv->phy_iface = of_get_phy_mode(dev->of_node);
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "pmu_regulator", &strings);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("%s: Can not read property: pmu_regulator.\n", __func__);
> + bsp_priv->power_ctrl_by_pmu = false;
> + } else {
> + pr_info("%s: ethernet phy power controlled by pmu(%s).\n",
> + __func__, strings);
> + bsp_priv->power_ctrl_by_pmu = true;
> + strcpy(bsp_priv->pmu_regulator, strings);
> + }

There is a generic regulator-dt-binding for regulator-consumers available
which you should of course use.


> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "pmu_enable_level", &value);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("%s: Can not read property: pmu_enable_level.\n",
> + __func__);
> + bsp_priv->power_ctrl_by_pmu = false;
> + } else {
> + pr_info("%s: PHY power controlled by pmu(level = %s).\n",
> + __func__, (value == 1) ? "HIGH" : "LOW");
> + bsp_priv->power_ctrl_by_pmu = true;
> + bsp_priv->pmu_enable_level = value;
> + }

What is this used for? Enabling should of course be done via regulator_enable
and disabling using regulator_disable.


> +
> + ret = of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "clock_in_out", &strings);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("%s: Can not read property: clock_in_out.\n", __func__);
> + bsp_priv->clock_input = true;
> + } else {
> + pr_info("%s: clock input or output? (%s).\n",
> + __func__, strings);
> + if (!strcmp(strings, "input"))
> + bsp_priv->clock_input = true;
> + else
> + bsp_priv->clock_input = false;
> + }
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "tx_delay", &value);
> + if (ret) {
> + bsp_priv->tx_delay = 0x30;
> + pr_err("%s: Can not read property: tx_delay.", __func__);
> + pr_err("%s: set tx_delay to 0x%x\n",
> + __func__, bsp_priv->tx_delay);
> + } else {
> + pr_info("%s: TX delay(0x%x).\n", __func__, value);
> + bsp_priv->tx_delay = value;
> + }
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "rx_delay", &value);
> + if (ret) {
> + bsp_priv->rx_delay = 0x10;
> + pr_err("%s: Can not read property: rx_delay.", __func__);
> + pr_err("%s: set rx_delay to 0x%x\n",
> + __func__, bsp_priv->rx_delay);
> + } else {
> + pr_info("%s: RX delay(0x%x).\n", __func__, value);
> + bsp_priv->rx_delay = value;
> + }
> +
> + bsp_priv->grf = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
> + "rockchip,grf");
> + bsp_priv->phyirq_io =
> + of_get_named_gpio_flags(dev->of_node,
> + "phyirq-gpio", 0, &flags);
> + bsp_priv->phyirq_io_level = (flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) ? 0 : 1;
> +
> + bsp_priv->reset_io =
> + of_get_named_gpio_flags(dev->of_node,
> + "reset-gpio", 0, &flags);
> + bsp_priv->reset_io_level = (flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) ? 0 : 1;
> +
> + bsp_priv->power_io =
> + of_get_named_gpio_flags(dev->of_node, "power-gpio", 0, &flags);
> + bsp_priv->power_io_level = (flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) ? 0 : 1;
> +
> + /*power*/
> + if (!gpio_is_valid(bsp_priv->power_io)) {
> + pr_err("%s: Failed to get GPIO %s.\n",
> + __func__, "power-gpio");
> + } else {
> + ret = gpio_request(bsp_priv->power_io, GPIO_PHY_POWER);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("%s: ERROR: Failed to request GPIO %s.\n",
> + __func__, GPIO_PHY_POWER);
> + }

When everything power-related is handled using the regulator api, you don't
need this


> +
> + if (!gpio_is_valid(bsp_priv->reset_io)) {
> + pr_err("%s: ERROR: Get reset-gpio failed.\n", __func__);
> + } else {
> + ret = gpio_request(bsp_priv->reset_io, GPIO_PHY_RESET);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("%s: ERROR: Failed to request GPIO %s.\n",
> + __func__, GPIO_PHY_RESET);
> + }
> +
> + if (bsp_priv->phyirq_io > 0) {

This is more for my understanding: why does the mac driver need to handle the
phy interrupt - but I might be overlooking something.


> + struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat_dat;
> +
> + pr_info("PHY irq in use\n");
> + ret = gpio_request(bsp_priv->phyirq_io, GPIO_PHY_IRQ);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_warn("%s: Failed to request GPIO %s\n",
> + __func__, GPIO_PHY_IRQ);
> + goto goon;
> + }
> +
> + ret = gpio_direction_input(bsp_priv->phyirq_io);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_err("%s, Failed to set input for GPIO %s\n",
> + __func__, GPIO_PHY_IRQ);
> + gpio_free(bsp_priv->phyirq_io);
> + goto goon;
> + }
> +
> + irq = gpio_to_irq(bsp_priv->phyirq_io);
> + if (irq < 0) {
> + ret = irq;
> + pr_err("Failed to set irq for %s\n",
> + GPIO_PHY_IRQ);
> + gpio_free(bsp_priv->phyirq_io);
> + goto goon;
> + }
> +
> + plat_dat = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> + if (plat_dat)
> + plat_dat->mdio_bus_data->probed_phy_irq = irq;
> + else
> + pr_err("%s: plat_data is NULL\n", __func__);
> + }
> +
> +goon:
> + /*rmii or rgmii*/
> + if (bsp_priv->phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII) {
> + pr_info("%s: init for RGMII\n", __func__);
> + set_to_rgmii(bsp_priv, bsp_priv->tx_delay, bsp_priv->rx_delay);
> + } else if (bsp_priv->phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII) {
> + pr_info("%s: init for RMII\n", __func__);
> + set_to_rmii(bsp_priv);
> + } else {
> + pr_err("%s: ERROR: NO interface defined!\n", __func__);
> + }
> +
> + bsp_priv->pdev = pdev;
> +
> + gmac_clk_init(bsp_priv);
> +
> + return bsp_priv;
> +}
> +
> +static int rk_gmac_init(struct platform_device *pdev, void *priv)
> +{
> + struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv = priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = phy_power_on(bsp_priv, true);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = gmac_clk_enable(bsp_priv, true);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void rk_gmac_exit(struct platform_device *pdev, void *priv)
> +{
> + struct rk_priv_data *gmac = priv;
> +
> + phy_power_on(gmac, false);
> + gmac_clk_enable(gmac, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void rk_fix_speed(void *priv, unsigned int speed)
> +{
> + struct rk_priv_data *bsp_priv = priv;
> +
> + if (bsp_priv->phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII)
> + set_rgmii_speed(bsp_priv, speed);
> + else if (bsp_priv->phy_iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII)
> + set_rmii_speed(bsp_priv, speed);
> + else
> + pr_err("unsupported interface %d", bsp_priv->phy_iface);
> +}
> +
> +const struct stmmac_of_data rk_gmac_data = {
> + .has_gmac = 1,
> + .fix_mac_speed = rk_fix_speed,
> + .setup = rk_gmac_setup,
> + .init = rk_gmac_init,
> + .exit = rk_gmac_exit,
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c index
> 15814b7..b4dee96 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>
> static const struct of_device_id stmmac_dt_ids[] = {
> /* SoC specific glue layers should come before generic bindings */
> + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-gmac", .data = &rk_gmac_data},

please name that rk3288_gmac_data [of course the other occurences too]
It makes it easier to see which soc it is meant for and it's also not save to
assume that the next one will use the same register + bit positions in the
grf.


> { .compatible = "amlogic,meson6-dwmac", .data = &meson6_dwmac_data},
> { .compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-gmac", .data = &sun7i_gmac_data},
> { .compatible = "st,stih415-dwmac", .data = &stih4xx_dwmac_data},
> @@ -291,6 +292,8 @@ static int stmmac_pltfr_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev) return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> + pdev->dev.platform_data = plat_dat;
> +
> ret = stmmac_probe_config_dt(pdev, plat_dat, &mac);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s: main dt probe failed", __func__);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.h index
> 25dd1f7..32a0516 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.h
> @@ -24,5 +24,6 @@ extern const struct stmmac_of_data sun7i_gmac_data;
> extern const struct stmmac_of_data stih4xx_dwmac_data;
> extern const struct stmmac_of_data stid127_dwmac_data;
> extern const struct stmmac_of_data socfpga_gmac_data;
> +extern const struct stmmac_of_data rk_gmac_data;
>
> #endif /* __STMMAC_PLATFORM_H__ */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/