Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: introduce sendfd() syscall

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue Dec 02 2014 - 11:43:03 EST

On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 03:23 +1100, Alex Dubov wrote:

> Same as SIGKILL. And yet, our machines are still working fine.
> If process A has sufficient capability to send signals to process B,
> then process B is already at its mercy, fds or not fds.

Tell me how a 128 threads program can use this new mechanism in a
scalable way.

One signal per thread ?

I guess we'll keep AF_UNIX then, thank you.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at