Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: introduce sendfd() syscall
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue Dec 02 2014 - 11:43:03 EST
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 03:23 +1100, Alex Dubov wrote:
> Same as SIGKILL. And yet, our machines are still working fine.
> If process A has sufficient capability to send signals to process B,
> then process B is already at its mercy, fds or not fds.
Tell me how a 128 threads program can use this new mechanism in a
One signal per thread ?
I guess we'll keep AF_UNIX then, thank you.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/