Re: [patch] CodingStyle: add some more error handling guidelines
From: SF Markus Elfring
Date: Wed Dec 03 2014 - 11:01:13 EST
>> Which name pattern do you find more appropriate in such
>> an use case?
> I think Dan wants the label to be descriptive about the tasks
> needed in the exception handling itself.
I would usually prefer also such a target-oriented labelling
for the affected identifiers.
How are the chances to express an expectation in this direction
unambiguously for the proposed coding style update?
> This makes sense as the exception handling steps may be reused
> for different failures in the code.
I would stress a different reason from my point of view.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/