Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] i2c-designware: Add Intel Baytrail PMIC I2C bus support
From: Mika Westerberg
Date: Wed Dec 03 2014 - 15:06:19 EST
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 04:09:33PM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> This patch implements an I2C bus sharing mechanism between the host and platform
> hardware on select Intel BayTrail SoC platforms using the X-Powers AXP288 PMIC.
> On these platforms access to the PMIC must be shared with platform hardware. The
> hardware unit assumes full control of the I2C bus and the host must request
> access through a special semaphore. Hardware control of the bus also makes it
> necessary to disable runtime pm to avoid interfering with hardware transactions.
> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 12 +++
> drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h | 6 ++
> 4 files changed, 174 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> index 917c358..d2bfd88 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> @@ -464,6 +464,18 @@ config I2C_DESIGNWARE_PCI
> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> will be called i2c-designware-pci.
> +config I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL
> + bool "Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore support"
> + depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y
Hmm, is there something preventing to compile this as module?
What comes to the driver itself, no objections from me.
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/