Re: [PATCH 0/20] fix misspelling of current function in string

From: Julian Calaby
Date: Sun Dec 07 2014 - 18:45:28 EST


Hi Julia,

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> These patches replace what appears to be a reference to the name of the
> current function but is misspelled in some way by either the name of the
> function itself, or by %s and then __func__ in an argument list.

Would there be any value in doing this for _all_ cases where the
function name is written in a format string?

Thanks,

--
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/