Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] gpu: drm: i915: intel_display.c: Remove unused function
From: Paulo Zanoni
Date: Mon Dec 08 2014 - 11:18:37 EST
2014-12-08 12:17 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:32:49AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> 2014-12-08 6:42 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>:
>> > On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 07:29:17PM +0100, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
>> >> Remove the function intel_output_name() that is not used anywhere.
>> >> This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
>> >> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Queued for 3.20, thanks for the patch.
>> This function was created for the "DDI personality" patches. We merged
>> the function but never ended up merging the patch containing the
> Oops, I've thought this is a renmant from the very first days of kms that
> somehow stuck around. That's what I get for once not using git blame
> excessively :( Want me to drop the patch again?
I am not opposed to the removal of an unused function: I understand
the value in the removal, and I also understand the reasons to keep
it. I was just pointing the reason of why we got here: we merged patch
1/2 but ended up never merging patch 2/2 because we always spot some
additional work required and it's a very low priority bug. If this
function is removed, the next person to try to ressurrect the ddi
personality patch can quickly resurrect it or even write a new
implementation from scratch. It is your decision :)
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/