Re: [PATCH 2/3] kconfig: remove undocumented type definition alias 'boolean'

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 12/08/2014 10:15 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 21:36 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 20:41 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > Well, it seems the treewide "boolean" cleanup should be done first.
> > > Removing support for "boolean" could than be a second, separate step.
> > > Just to ease review.
> >
> > This appears to have no effect on the .config files I generated for the
> > defconfig files in next-20141208. (After porting the patch and changing
> > those last booleans to bool, that is.) So that's good.
> >
> > If you'd resend as two patches on top of linux-next, I might add an
> > Acked-by: or a Tested-by:.
>
> My last mail on this series. To make sure the tree stays buildable that
> second patch to drop support for 'boolean' should only be applied a
> release or two after the cleanup patch has been applied. Otherwise we're
> bound to run into fun build errors in linux-next, and even mainline, for
> quite a few commits, aren't we? One tree still using boolean is all it
> takes...

Sounds like a good plan, thanks a lot for looking into it, Paul!

Meanwhile, also checkpatch.pl could emit a deprecate warning in case
a patch carries Kconfig code with 'boolean' in it, but I leave that
up to Christoph to decide. ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/