Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: rk3x: fix bug that cause measured high_ns doesn't meet I2C specification

From: Doug Anderson
Date: Thu Dec 11 2014 - 14:22:39 EST


Hi,

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Addy Ke <addy.ke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> - clock-frequency : SCL frequency to use (in Hz). If omitted, 100kHz is used.
> + - i2c-scl-rising-time-ns : Number of nanoseconds the signal takes to rise
> + (t(r) in I2C specification). If not specified this is assumed to be
> + the maximum the specification allows(1000 ns for Standard-mode,
> + 300 ns for Fast-mode) which might cause slightly slower communication.
> + - i2c-scl-falling-time-ns : Number of nanoseconds the signal takes to fall
> + (t(f) in the I2C specification). If not specified this is assumed to
> + be the maximum the specification allows (300 ns) which might cause
> + slightly slowercommunication.

nit: you forgot a space between "slower" and "communication".

...this is the type of thing I think Wolfram can fixup when applying,
so I'd suggest against respinning unless something else is needed.

Overall I continue to be happy with this patch.

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

You'll notice that I posted a patch atop it at
<https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5477201/>.

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/