Re: Progress on system crash traces with LTTng using DAX and pmem

From: Matt Fleming
Date: Sat Dec 13 2014 - 06:48:35 EST

On Thu, 30 Oct, at 03:11:36PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Hi Kirill,
> This is a good point,
> There are a few more aspects to consider here:
> - Other architectures appear to have different guarantees, for
> instance ARM which, AFAIK, does not reset memory on soft
> reboot (well at least for my customer's boards). So I guess
> if x86 wants to be competitive, it would be good for them to
> offer a similar feature,
> - Already having a subset of machines supporting this is useful,
> e.g. storing trace buffers and recovering them after a crash,
> - Since we are in a world of dynamically upgradable BIOS, perhaps
> if we can show that there is value in having a BIOS option to
> specify a memory range that should not be reset on soft reboot,
> BIOS vendors might be inclined to include an option for it,
> - Perhaps UEFI BIOS already have some way of specifying that a
> memory range should not be reset on soft reboot ?

We've achieved this in the past using UEFI capsules with the

Unfortunately, runtime capsule support is pretty spotty, so it's not a
general solution right now.

Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at