Re: Maintainer abuse
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Sat Dec 13 2014 - 12:47:08 EST
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 01:52:31PM +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> It could then be integrated into git (if only so we can have a "git lost"
> command to block annoying sources)
All sounds nice and good but I'd be fine with people adhering to the
one-week feedback gather rule and not sending patchsets during the merge
window, for starters. I think those two will get us pretty far.
> 2. Is X86 moving at a rate which needs some additional maintainers to
> "maintain" the pending queue during merge windows and the like, and get
> stuff into order for the maintainers proper ?
Yep, no patches during the merge window should be a good start.
The rest of the time x86 actually scales pretty fine IMO.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/