Re: [PATCH] i2c: sh_mobile: I2C_SH_MOBILE should depend on HAS_DMA

From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Wed Dec 17 2014 - 01:58:22 EST


On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 02:37:04PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> If NO_DMA=y:
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `sh_mobile_i2c_dma_unmap':
> i2c-sh_mobile.c:(.text+0x60de42): undefined reference to `dma_unmap_single'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `sh_mobile_i2c_xfer_dma':
> i2c-sh_mobile.c:(.text+0x60df22): undefined reference to `dma_map_single'
> i2c-sh_mobile.c:(.text+0x60df2e): undefined reference to `dma_mapping_error'
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for spotting this. However, since DMA is opt-in, isn't this
dependency too much? I can't think of anything better than #ifdeffing
the code, though.

> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> index c1351d9fb35bbc8d..f08dd20f625c184d 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
> @@ -753,6 +753,7 @@ config I2C_SH7760
>
> config I2C_SH_MOBILE
> tristate "SuperH Mobile I2C Controller"
> + depends on HAS_DMA
> depends on SUPERH || ARCH_SHMOBILE || COMPILE_TEST
> help
> If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
> --
> 1.9.1
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature