Re: [PATCH] fs: overlayfs: Fix coding style issues, missing a blank line after declarations
From: Joe Perches
Date: Sun Dec 28 2014 - 22:01:15 EST
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 02:49 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 02:39:39AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 11:56:53AM +0600, Alexander Kuleshov wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > For the record: anything of that sort against fs/*.c will be flushed down
> > the toilet where such valuable contributions belong. Don't even bother.
> Joe, could you please explain what has driven you to include that into
> scripts/checkpatch.pl and open the countless sphincters? Aren't we
> getting enough pointless patches as it is?
I don't care for that style actually.
It was Andrew Morton that wanted it used globally.
I wanted it to be a --strict test and only for
net/ and drivers/net/ where David Miller prefers
> Al, stongly tempted to try and sneak a patch to checkpatch.pl declaring the
> lack of /* See Figure 1 */ within the first 10 lines of a function an offense
> against the Gods Of Style. Then sit back and watch the resulting spew...
Cool. Awaiting your patch...
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/