Re: [PATCH] spi/spidev: Convert to use unified device property API
From: Mark Brown
Date: Tue Dec 30 2014 - 06:23:54 EST
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 09:37:14AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 04:03:16PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Which nobody should be doing since it's already totally broken for
> > something to be using this on the DT side except in the one case of the
> > Rohm device which is listed there. I don't want to merge anything which
> > allows the breakage we're seeing with people putting spidev in their DTs
> > to be propagated into ACPI, at most we should have something that
> > specifically identifies individual devices only.
> It is pretty convenient for testing SPI bus and that's why I thought
> it would be good to have possibility to enumerate this in similar way
> than DT does but I understand your point.
My intention is to break this for DT, at least make it scream loud
warnings when it's used if not actually fail.
Description: Digital signature