Re: [PATCH RESEND] dma-mapping: tidy up dma_parms default handling

[Robin Murphy]

On 09/01/15 19:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 09 January 2015 16:56:03 Robin Murphy wrote:
> > This one's a bit tricky to find a home for - I think technically it's
> > probably an IOMMU patch, but then the long-underlying problem doesn't
> > seem to have blown up anything until arm64, and my motivation is to
> > make bits of Juno work, which seems to nudge it towards arm64/arm-soc
> > territory. Could anyone suggest which tree is most appropriate?
>
> I have a set of patches touching various dma-mapping.h related bits
> across architectures and in ARM in particular. Your patch fits into
> that series, and I guess we could either have it in my asm-generic
> tree or in Andrew Morton's mm tree. Possibly also arm-soc for practical
> reasons, although it really doesn't belong in there.

Thanks Arnd, I'd agree asm-generic or mm sound the most sensible - If 
you're happy to carry this patch with your series that'd be really helpful.

Robin.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/