[PATCH 3.18 073/150] i2c: designware: Fix falling time bindings doc

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Wed Jan 14 2015 - 02:27:55 EST


3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 8e2596e81a9dd8f9efcf78476f3990f211e25edb upstream.

In (6468276 i2c: designware: make SCL and SDA falling time
configurable) new device tree properties were added for setting the
falling time of SDA and SCL. The device tree bindings doc had a typo
in it: it forgot the "-ns" suffix for both properies in the prose of
the bindings.

I assume this is a typo because:
* The source code includes the "-ns"
* The example in the bindings includes the "-ns".

Fix the typo.

Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 6468276b2206 ("i2c: designware: make SCL and SDA falling time configurable")
Acked-by: Romain Baeriswyl <romain.baeriswyl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-designware.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-designware.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-designware.txt
@@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ Optional properties :
- i2c-sda-hold-time-ns : should contain the SDA hold time in nanoseconds.
This option is only supported in hardware blocks version 1.11a or newer.

- - i2c-scl-falling-time : should contain the SCL falling time in nanoseconds.
+ - i2c-scl-falling-time-ns : should contain the SCL falling time in nanoseconds.
This value which is by default 300ns is used to compute the tLOW period.

- - i2c-sda-falling-time : should contain the SDA falling time in nanoseconds.
+ - i2c-sda-falling-time-ns : should contain the SDA falling time in nanoseconds.
This value which is by default 300ns is used to compute the tHIGH period.

Example :


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/