Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] clocksource: driver for Conexant Digicolor SoC timer

From: Baruch Siach
Date: Mon Jan 26 2015 - 08:48:03 EST


Hi Daniel,

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 02:44:15PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Makefile b/drivers/clocksource/Makefile
> >index 94d90b24b56b..a993c108be67 100644
> >--- a/drivers/clocksource/Makefile
> >+++ b/drivers/clocksource/Makefile
> >@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SH_TIMER_TMU) += sh_tmu.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_EM_TIMER_STI) += em_sti.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CLKBLD_I8253) += i8253.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CLKSRC_MMIO) += mmio.o
> >+obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DIGICOLOR) += timer-digicolor.o
>
> Ah, one minor change I forgot to mention in the last review (sorry about
> that).
>
> Don't depend on the ARCH, add and select a TIMER_DIGICOLOR (or whatever the
> name you prefer) in the mach-digicolor/Kconfig and use it here.

OK. I'll make the change. I'm just curious: what is the advantage of having a
separate config symbol for the timer?

baruch

--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@xxxxxxxxxx - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/