Re: [PATCH] mmc: print message if a card supports secure erase/trim

[Alexander Holler]

Am 27.01.2015 um 13:31 schrieb Richard Weinberger:

> > Also it's unlikely I will send any further patch. There are still 21 from me where I've exposed sysfs attributes for NAND devices which are still not applied and most NAND devices
> > still don't have a sysfs entry.
> >
> > So why should I waste my time again?
>
> If you give up after the first review round there is nothing I can do for you.
> Postings like https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/30/162 are also not really beneficial
> to get a patch merged.

Yes. Sorry, but I had so many bad experiences with maintainers. They 
told me that using functions means hiding stuff, that I should bisect 
even when I was absolutely sure which patch was wrong (and everxyone 
could see it by just reading the source and by reading my comments, I've 
got blamed because I prefer a controlled BUG_ON() (which might even just 
kill the involved tasks, depending on config settings) instead of a 
desastrous memory corruption which (hard-) reseted the machine (and 
might have done even more bad things) and so on.

Regards,

Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/