Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm: fix suspend/resume paths for TPM 2.0

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 06:57:22PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > +	/* TPM 1.2 requires self-test on resume. */
> > > +	if (!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)) {
> > > +		ret = tpm_do_selftest(chip);
> > > +		if (ret < 0)
> > > +			return ret;
> > 
> > Just to note, the return value from tpm_do_selftest() on TPM 1.2 chips was 
> > previously ignored. Mine does return 0.
> 
> Right. I can update the patch to ignore return value if the majority
> wants that.

What happens to the system when pnp_driver.resume() returns failure?

Should tpm ever report failure on resume to the rest of the kernel?

Shouldn't this stuff be in tpm_pm_resume common code anyhow?

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/