Re: patch-2.7.3 no longer applies relative symbolic link patches

[Junio C Hamano]

Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Ugh. I don't see anything we can do about this on the git side, and I
>> do kind of understand why 'patch' would be worried about '..' files.
>> In a perfect world, patch would parse the filename and see that it
>> stays within the directory structure of the project, but that is a
>> rather harder thing to do than just say "no dot-dot files".
>
> It is unclear to me why "limit to the current directory and below"
> is such a big deal in the first place.
>
> If the user wants to apply a patch that touches ../etc/shadow, is
> the tool in the place to complain?"

Let me take this part back.

I think "git apply" should behave closely to "git apply --index"
(which is used by "git am" unless there is a very good reason not to
(and "'git apply --index' behaves differently from GNU patch, and we
should match what the latter does" is not a very good reason).  When
the index guards the working tree, we do not follow any symlink,
whether the destination is inside the current directory or not.

I however do not think the current "git apply" notices that it will
overwrite a path beyond a symlink---we may need to fix that if that
is the case.  I'll see what I can find (but I'll be doing 2.3-rc2
today so it may be later this week).

Thanks.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/