Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v7 04/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce early_param for "acpi" and pass acpi=force to enable ACPI

[Timur Tabi]

On 01/28/2015 12:14 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > >So it looks like there's a whole conversation about this already in
> > >this thread that I didn't notice.  However, reading through all of it,
> > >I still don't understand sure why the presence of ACPI tables is
> > >insufficient to enable ACPI.

> Because ACPI on arm64 is still experimental, no matter how many people
> claim that it is production ready in their private setups.

Fair enough.  Does this mean that passing "acpi=force" on the kernel 
command line is a requirement for ARM64 servers?

> > >In what situation would we want to ignore ACPI tables that are
> > >present?

> When DT tables are also present (and for the first platforms, that's
> highly recommended, though not easily enforceable at the kernel level).

My understanding is that the EFI stub creates a device tree (and it 
contains some important information), so I don't understand how we can 
ever have an ACPI-only platform on ARM64 servers.

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/