Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lustre: osc: fix Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:05:33PM +0200, Heba Aamer wrote:
> This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl warning:
> Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heba Aamer <heba93aamer@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c
> index 8e22e45..4da837e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static int osc_checksum_type_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  		else
>  			seq_printf(m, "%s ", cksum_name[i]);
>  	}
> -	seq_printf(m, "\n");
> +	seq_puts(m, "\n");

I don't think this is a straight search/replace issue, but:

>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ static int osc_rpc_stats_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>  	seq_printf(seq, "pending read pages:   %d\n",
>  		   atomic_read(&cli->cl_pending_r_pages));
>  
> -	seq_printf(seq, "\n\t\t\tread\t\t\twrite\n");
> +	seq_puts(seq, "\n\t\t\tread\t\t\twrite\n");
>  	seq_printf(seq, "pages per rpc	 rpcs   %% cum %% |");
>  	seq_printf(seq, "       rpcs   %% cum %%\n");

if it were, why didn't you fix the other uses here?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/