Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP1: PM: fix some build warnings on 1510-only Kconfigs

From: Jon Hunter
Date: Wed Feb 11 2015 - 12:40:08 EST


Hi Paul,

On 02/11/2015 02:25 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> thanks for the review,
>
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Jon Hunter wrote:

[snip]

> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP1: PM: fix some build warnings on 1510-only Kconfigs
>
> Building an OMAP1510-only Kconfig generates the following warnings:
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c: In function ʽomap1_pm_idleʼ:
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c:123:2: warning: #warning Enable 32kHz OS timer in order to allow sleep states in idle [-Wcpp]
> #warning Enable 32kHz OS timer in order to allow sleep states in idle
> ^
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c: At top level:
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c:76:23: warning: ʽenable_dyn_sleepʼ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
> static unsigned short enable_dyn_sleep = 0;
> ^
>
> These are not so easy to fix in an obviously correct fashion, since I
> don't have these devices up and running in my testbed. So, use
> arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig and the existing pm.c source as a guide,
> and posit that deep power saving states are only supported on OMAP16xx
> chips with kernels built with both CONFIG_OMAP_DM_TIMER=y and
> CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER=y.
>
> While here, clean up a few printk()s and unnecessary #ifdefs.
>
> This second version of the patch incorporates several suggestions from
> Jon Hunter <jgchunter@xxxxxxxxx>.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Tuukka Tikkanen <tuukka.tikkanen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jgchunter@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c
> index 34b4c0044961..dd94567c3628 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c
> @@ -71,13 +71,7 @@ static unsigned int mpui7xx_sleep_save[MPUI7XX_SLEEP_SAVE_SIZE];
> static unsigned int mpui1510_sleep_save[MPUI1510_SLEEP_SAVE_SIZE];
> static unsigned int mpui1610_sleep_save[MPUI1610_SLEEP_SAVE_SIZE];
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER
> -
> -static unsigned short enable_dyn_sleep = 0;
> -
> -#else
> -
> -static unsigned short enable_dyn_sleep = 1;
> +static unsigned short enable_dyn_sleep;
>
> static ssize_t idle_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> @@ -90,8 +84,9 @@ static ssize_t idle_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> {
> unsigned short value;
> if (sscanf(buf, "%hu", &value) != 1 ||
> - (value != 0 && value != 1)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "idle_sleep_store: Invalid value\n");
> + (value != 0 && value != 1) ||
> + (value != 0 && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER))) {
> + pr_err("idle_sleep_store: Invalid value\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> enable_dyn_sleep = value;
> @@ -101,7 +96,6 @@ static ssize_t idle_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> static struct kobj_attribute sleep_while_idle_attr =
> __ATTR(sleep_while_idle, 0644, idle_show, idle_store);
>
> -#endif
>
> static void (*omap_sram_suspend)(unsigned long r0, unsigned long r1) = NULL;
>
> @@ -115,16 +109,11 @@ void omap1_pm_idle(void)
> {
> extern __u32 arm_idlect1_mask;
> __u32 use_idlect1 = arm_idlect1_mask;
> - int do_sleep = 0;
>
> local_fiq_disable();
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_OMAP_MPU_TIMER) && !defined(CONFIG_OMAP_DM_TIMER)
> -#warning Enable 32kHz OS timer in order to allow sleep states in idle

Thinking about this some more, I don't understand the dependency on the
DM_TIMER here. For an omap1 device, regardless of whether the DM_TIMERs
are enable or not, the device should be able to enter low power if the
32K is enabled. Hence, shouldn't this have been !(CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER)
above?

Furthermore, you will get the above warning on a omap16xx only build if
you disable DM_TIMERs and keep MPU_TIMER enabled, which should be a
valid thing to do.

Tony, I see you added the DM_TIMER dependency in commit
be26a008414414c69a4ae9fe9877401c3ba62c5a. I understand your motivation,
but why not just use !(CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER) here? Bit 9 of the idlect1
is only for the TIMCK clock that is used for the MPU timers and not the
DM_TIMERs.

-#if defined(CONFIG_OMAP_MPU_TIMER) && !defined(CONFIG_OMAP_DM_TIMER)
-#warning Enable 32kHz OS timer in order to allow sleep states in idle
+#if !defined(CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER)
use_idlect1 = use_idlect1 & ~(1 << 9);
-#else
- if (enable_dyn_sleep)
- do_sleep = 1;
#endif


> use_idlect1 = use_idlect1 & ~(1 << 9);
> -#else
> - if (enable_dyn_sleep)
> - do_sleep = 1;
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_DM_TIMER
> @@ -134,10 +123,12 @@ void omap1_pm_idle(void)
> if (omap_dma_running())
> use_idlect1 &= ~(1 << 6);
>
> - /* We should be able to remove the do_sleep variable and multiple
> + /*
> + * We should be able to remove the do_sleep variable and multiple
> * tests above as soon as drivers, timer and DMA code have been fixed.
> - * Even the sleep block count should become obsolete. */
> - if ((use_idlect1 != ~0) || !do_sleep) {
> + * Even the sleep block count should become obsolete.
> + */
> + if ((use_idlect1 != ~0) || !enable_dyn_sleep) {
>
> __u32 saved_idlect1 = omap_readl(ARM_IDLECT1);
> if (cpu_is_omap15xx())
> @@ -635,15 +626,25 @@ static const struct platform_suspend_ops omap_pm_ops = {
>
> static int __init omap_pm_init(void)
> {
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER
> - int error;
> -#endif
> + int error = 0;
>
> if (!cpu_class_is_omap1())
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - printk("Power Management for TI OMAP.\n");
> + pr_info("Power Management for TI OMAP.\n");
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER))
> + pr_info("OMAP1 PM: sleep states in idle disabled due to no 32KiHz timer\n");
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OMAP_DM_TIMER))
> + pr_info("OMAP1 PM: sleep states in idle disabled due to no DMTIMER support\n");

I am not sure this print is really needed.

> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OMAP_32K_TIMER) &&
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OMAP_DM_TIMER)) {

Or this dependency on DM_TIMERs either.

Sorry, should have looked a bit more closely at this.

Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/