Re: [PATCH 01/11] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs"

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 09:30 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 64-bit code was using six stack slots less by not saving/restoring
>>> registers which are callee-preserved according to C ABI,
>>> and not allocating space for them.
>>> Only when syscall needed a complete "struct pt_regs",
>>> the complete area was allocated and filled in.
>>> As an additional twist, on interrupt entry a "slightly less truncated pt_regs"
>>> trick is used, to make nested interrupt stacks easier to unwind.
>>>
>>> This proved to be a source of significant obfuscation and subtle bugs.
>>> For example, stub_fork had to pop the return address,
>>> extend the struct, save registers, and push return address back. Ugly.
>>> ia32_ptregs_common pops return address and "returns" via jmp insn,
>>> throwing a wrench into CPU return stack cache.
>>>
>>> This patch changes code to always allocate a complete "struct pt_regs".
>>> The saving of registers is still done lazily.
>>>
>>> "Partial pt_regs" trick on interrupt stack is retained, but with added comments
>>> which explain what we are doing, and why. Existing comments are improved.
>>>
>>> Macros which manipulate "struct pt_regs" on stack are reworked:
>>> ALLOC_PT_GPREGS_ON_STACK allocates the structure.
>>> SAVE_C_REGS saves to it those registers which are clobbered by C code.
>>> SAVE_EXTRA_REGS saves to it all other registers.
>>> Corresponding RESTORE_* and REMOVE_PT_GPREGS_FROM_STACK macros reverse it.
>>>
>>> ia32_ptregs_common, stub_fork and friends lost their ugly dance with
>>> return pointer.
>>>
>>> LOAD_ARGS32 in ia32entry.S now uses symbolic stack offsets
>>> instead of magic numbers.
>>>
>>> error_entry and save_paranoid now use SAVE_C_REGS + SAVE_EXTRA_REGS
>>> instead of having it open-coded yet again.
>>>
>>> Misleading and slightly wrong comments in "struct pt_regs" are fixed
>>> (four instances).
>>>
>>> Patch was run-tested: 64-bit executables, 32-bit executables,
>>> strace works.
>>> Timing tests did not show measurable difference in 32-bit
>>> and 64-bit syscalls.
>>
>> I like this.  However, can you split it?  I think it would be easier
>> to review and more bisect-friendly if there were first a patch to do
>> all the macro and comment cleanup without any layout changes followed
>> by bite-sized layout changes.
>
> Changes in macro names are intentionally made in a single patch,
> together with significant changes to their meanings.
> Renaming macros makes sure I reviewed all uses - otherwise
> (if I missed a macro use somewhere) it would just not compile.
>
> LOAD_ARGS32 change to use R9 etc instead of magic numbers like 16
> also can't be split up. The point is, 16 is not equal to R9 (which is 64),
> it only becomes equal because LOAD_ARGS32 is invoked with offset=ARGOFFSET,
> and ARGOFFSET+16 = R9. The patch sets ARGOFSSET to 0, thus only after this
> patch, I can replace magic number with R9. But if I'd do that,
> then _this_ patch would still need to replace one magic number (16) -
> with another magic number, 64, to not break stuff.
> It makes sense, then, to not do the change there twice, in two patches,
> and instead just bite the bullet and replace 16 with R9 in this patch.

Fair enough.  I'll have lots of fun reviewing, then.  This may take a
couple days.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/