Re: [PATCH 2/6] timekeeping: Pass readout base to update_fast_timekeeper()

From: John Stultz
Date: Thu Feb 12 2015 - 19:29:20 EST

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> Modify update_fast_timekeeper() to take a struct tk_read_base
> pointer as its argument (instead of a struct timekeeper pointer)
> and update its kerneldoc comment to reflect that.
> That will allow a struct tk_read_base that is not part of a
> struct timekeeper to be passed to it in the next patch.
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

Thomas was really behind the update_fast_timekeeper design so I'm not
sure I can critique if this fits in the larger vision here, but I
don't see anything wrong and its not breaking in any of my tests,

Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at