On Wed, 11 Feb, at 06:12:59PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Good point. Actually, I don't really see the need for patch #1, evenIvan, I'd prefer it if you move PATCH 1 to be PATCH 3, i.e. make the
if I agree that it would have been better to write it like you have in
the first place.
But leaving the dmi_len as u16 is clearly a bug on my part, so that
should be fixed.
@Matt: any thoughts?
urgent changes at the beginning of the series and the cleanups at the
end. That nicely sidesteps the issue of having to backport a cleanup
patch as a dependency for a real bug fix.