Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: fix NULL pointer dereference when use_hierarchy is 0
From: Johannes Weiner
Date: Tue Feb 17 2015 - 07:28:44 EST
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:33:27AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 17-02-15 14:24:59, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > It can be possible to return NULL in parent_mem_cgroup()
> > if use_hierarchy is 0.
> This alone is not sufficient because the low limit is present only in
> the unified hierarchy API and there is no use_hierarchy there. The
> primary issue here is that the memcg has 0 usage so the previous
> check for usage will not stop us. And that is bug IMO.
Yes, empty groups shouldn't be considered low.
> From f5d74671d30e44c50b45b4464c92f536f1dbdff6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:02:12 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] memcg: fix low limit calculation
> A memcg is considered low limited even when the current usage is equal
> to the low limit. This leads to interesting side effects e.g.
> groups/hierarchies with no memory accounted are considered protected and
> so the reclaim will emit MEMCG_LOW event when encountering them.
> Another and much bigger issue was reported by Joonsoo Kim. He has hit a
> NULL ptr dereference with the legacy cgroup API which even doesn't have
> low limit exposed. The limit is 0 by default but the initial check fails
> for memcg with 0 consumption and parent_mem_cgroup() would return NULL
> if use_hierarchy is 0 and so page_counter_read would try to dereference
> I suppose that the current implementation is just an overlook because
> the documentation in Documentation/cgroups/unified-hierarchy.txt says:
> The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
> reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it and all its
> ancestors are below their low boundaries
> Fix the usage and the low limit comparision in mem_cgroup_low accordingly.
> Fixes: 241994ed8649 (mm: memcontrol: default hierarchy interface for memory)
> Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/