Re: [patch -rt 1/2] KVM: use simple waitqueue for vcpu->wq
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Tue Feb 17 2015 - 12:44:48 EST
* Peter Zijlstra | 2015-01-21 16:07:16 [+0100]:
>On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 01:16:13PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> I'm actually wondering if we should just nuke the _interruptible()
>> version of swait. As it should only be all interruptible or all not
>> interruptible, that the swait_wake() should just do the wake up
>> regardless. In which case, swait_wake() is good enough. No need to have
>> different versions where people may think do something special.
>Yeah, I think the lastest thing I have sitting here on my disk only has
>the swake_up() which does TASK_NORMAL, no choice there.
what is the swait status in terms of mainline? This sounds like it
beeing worked on.
I could take the series but then I would drop it again if the mainline
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/