Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: udc-core: independent registration of gadgets and gadget drivers
From: Ruslan Bilovol
Date: Tue Feb 17 2015 - 16:02:37 EST
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
> W dniu 15.02.2015 o 23:43, Ruslan Bilovol pisze:
>>> In my opinion all things which you have described are working out-of-box
>>> when you use configfs interface. It's mostly ready so you may create
>>> equivalent of most legacy gadgets (apart from printer and tcm) and
>>> just bind from one udc to another whenever you want.
>> It's because legacy gadgets are easy to use and usually don't need any
>> userspace-side configuration. Are there any plans to remove legacy
>> drivers in the future?
> I'm not going to express strong opinions here, but their name implies
> that this can happen, some time in the future.
> And I also think it will not happen before the userspace part
> (libusbg, gt, gadgetd etc) is mature enough. My personal opinion
> in that matter is that it will take at least a couple of years
> to remove legacy gadgets entirely.
OK, so it looks like there is a sense even to add new gadget/functions
with legacy support
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/