On Tuesday 17 February 2015 12:00:49 Arun Ramamurthy wrote:The patch was written in a way that all the existing and new drivers can
Arnd, I patched the ehci and ohci driver to accept multiple phys so they
require different names and cannot both be "usb". That patch was
accepted by Alen Stern but I did not update the bindings documentation.
I will send out another patch for that. Could we go with the naming
scheme of "usb" + "p" + port number or do you have other suggestions?
I don't have a good idea, but I think it would be best if the first
phy could remain named "usb" for compatibility with the existing binding.
What is the reason for having two phys in your case? Are theseYes, we have three identical phys connected to a single host controller and one of the phys is also connected to the device controller
identical phy devices connected to a single controller or do they
server different purposes?