Re: [PATCH/RFC 2/2] regulator: da9210: Add optional interrupt support

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Thu Feb 19 2015 - 05:39:31 EST


Hi Mark,

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 03:18:40PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:11:12PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
>> >> - Does there exist any regulator notifier event that corresponds to
>> >> DA9210_E_VMAX?
>
>> > What does that mean, I might be able to tell you? I guess it might be
>> > an over voltage event...
>
>> Possibly. There's no regulator notifier event for that yet, though.
>> Shall I add one?
>
> I'm wondering if it may be better to change the first notification to
> just a general "out of regulation" one, though the consequences of over
> voltage are usually different to under voltage if that is what's going
> on here.
>
>> Anyway, let's wait for confirmation from Dialog...
>
> I guess - is there really no indication in the datasheet?

-ENOENT

(I hope that's actually -EPROBE_DEFER, as I applied for datasheet access
last week ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/