[PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 58/58] virtio_pci: document why we defer kfree

From: Luis Henriques
Date: Thu Feb 19 2015 - 08:53:53 EST


3.16.7-ckt7 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit a1eb03f546d651a8f39c7d0692b1f7f5b4e7e3cd upstream.

The reason we defer kfree until release function is because it's a
general rule for kobjects: kfree of the reference counter itself is only
legal in the release function.

Previous patch didn't make this clear, document this in code.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ luis: backported to 3.16:
- file rename: virtio_pci_legacy.c -> virtio_pci.c ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
index a46570005a98..52c4607fec9e 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
@@ -671,6 +671,9 @@ static void virtio_pci_release_dev(struct device *_d)
struct virtio_device *vdev = dev_to_virtio(_d);
struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);

+ /* As struct device is a kobject, it's not safe to
+ * free the memory (including the reference counter itself)
+ * until it's release callback. */
kfree(vp_dev);
}

--
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/