[PATCH v2] x86: fix output of show_stack_log_lvl()

From: Adrien Schildknecht
Date: Thu Feb 19 2015 - 21:35:57 EST


show_stack_log_lvl() does not set the log level after a new line,
the following messages printed with pr_cont are thus assigned to the
default log level.
This patch prepends the log level to the next message following a new
line.

print_trace_address() uses printk(log_lvl). Using printk with just
a log level is ignored and thus has no effect on the next pr_cont.
We need to prepend the log level directly into the message.

Signed-off-by: Adrien Schildknecht <adrien+dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 11 ++++++-----
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c | 9 ++++++---
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 9 ++++++---
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index cf3df1d..81b3932 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -25,10 +25,12 @@ unsigned int code_bytes = 64;
int kstack_depth_to_print = 3 * STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE;
static int die_counter;

-static void printk_stack_address(unsigned long address, int reliable)
+static void printk_stack_address(unsigned long address, int reliable,
+ void *data)
{
- pr_cont(" [<%p>] %s%pB\n",
- (void *)address, reliable ? "" : "? ", (void *)address);
+ printk("%s [<%p>] %s%pB\n",
+ (char *)data, (void *)address, reliable ? "" : "? ",
+ (void *)address);
}

void printk_address(unsigned long address)
@@ -155,8 +157,7 @@ static int print_trace_stack(void *data, char *name)
static void print_trace_address(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
{
touch_nmi_watchdog();
- printk(data);
- printk_stack_address(addr, reliable);
+ printk_stack_address(addr, reliable, data);
}

static const struct stacktrace_ops print_trace_ops = {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
index 5abd4cd..efff5ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
@@ -108,9 +108,12 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
for (i = 0; i < kstack_depth_to_print; i++) {
if (kstack_end(stack))
break;
- if (i && ((i % STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE) == 0))
- pr_cont("\n");
- pr_cont(" %08lx", *stack++);
+ if ((i % STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE) == 0) {
+ if (i != 0)
+ pr_cont("\n");
+ printk("%s %08lx", log_lvl, *stack++);
+ } else
+ pr_cont(" %08lx", *stack++);
touch_nmi_watchdog();
}
pr_cont("\n");
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
index ff86f19..553573b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
@@ -283,9 +283,12 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
if (((long) stack & (THREAD_SIZE-1)) == 0)
break;
}
- if (i && ((i % STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE) == 0))
- pr_cont("\n");
- pr_cont(" %016lx", *stack++);
+ if ((i % STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE) == 0) {
+ if (i != 0)
+ pr_cont("\n");
+ printk("%s %016lx", log_lvl, *stack++);
+ } else
+ pr_cont(" %016lx", *stack++);
touch_nmi_watchdog();
}
preempt_enable();
--
2.2.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/