Re: [PATCH] ipmi: Remove uses of return value of seq_printf
From: Corey Minyard
Date: Thu Feb 19 2015 - 22:10:24 EST
Not a big deal, thanks for following up. Send a relative patch,
please. I already have this queued for upstream.
On 02/18/2015 06:02 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 11:56 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote:
>> Thanks, queued for 3.20.
> Hey Corey, thanks, but I'll either have to send a new
> patch or an updated patch changing these new
> seq_has_overflowed() uses to 0.
> There's no functional difference, but there is a logical
> one. has_overflowed(), if it returns "true" (it won't here
> because the first alloc seq_fs does has sufficient space)
> would not retry and simply not emit anything.
> Anyway, do you want a new patch or a relative patch?
> sorry 'bout that, Joe
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/