Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] Programmatic nestable expedited grace periods
From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Fri Feb 20 2015 - 12:32:48 EST
Does it really make a machine boot much faster? Why are people using
synchronous gp primitives if they care about speed? Should we not fix
The report I heard was that it provided 10-15% faster boot times.
That's not insignificant; got more details? I think we should really
look at why people are using the sync primitives.
I must defer to the people who took the exact measurements.
But yes, once I have that info, I should add it to the commit log.
so the two most obvious cases are
Registering sysrq keys ... even when the old key code had no handler
(have a patch pending for this)
registering idle handlers
(this is more tricky, it's very obvious abuse but the fix is less clear)
there's a few others as well that I'm chasing down...
.. but the flip side, prior to running ring 3 code, why NOT do fast expedites?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/