Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] Programmatic nestable expedited grace periods

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Fri Feb 20 2015 - 12:32:48 EST

Does it really make a machine boot much faster? Why are people using
synchronous gp primitives if they care about speed? Should we not fix
that instead?

The report I heard was that it provided 10-15% faster boot times.

That's not insignificant; got more details? I think we should really
look at why people are using the sync primitives.

I must defer to the people who took the exact measurements.

But yes, once I have that info, I should add it to the commit log.

so the two most obvious cases are

Registering sysrq keys ... even when the old key code had no handler
(have a patch pending for this)

registering idle handlers
(this is more tricky, it's very obvious abuse but the fix is less clear)

there's a few others as well that I'm chasing down...
.. but the flip side, prior to running ring 3 code, why NOT do fast expedites?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at