[PATCH 08/27] rtc: Remove use of seq_printf return value

From: Joe Perches
Date: Sat Feb 21 2015 - 22:00:28 EST


The seq_printf return value, because it's frequently misused,
will eventually be converted to void.

See: commit 1f33c41c03da ("seq_file: Rename seq_overflow() to
seq_has_overflowed() and make public")

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c | 6 +++---
drivers/rtc/rtc-mrst.c | 16 +++++++++-------
drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c | 4 +++-
4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
index 5b2e761..87647f4 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -459,23 +459,25 @@ static int cmos_procfs(struct device *dev, struct seq_file *seq)
/* NOTE: at least ICH6 reports battery status using a different
* (non-RTC) bit; and SQWE is ignored on many current systems.
*/
- return seq_printf(seq,
- "periodic_IRQ\t: %s\n"
- "update_IRQ\t: %s\n"
- "HPET_emulated\t: %s\n"
- // "square_wave\t: %s\n"
- "BCD\t\t: %s\n"
- "DST_enable\t: %s\n"
- "periodic_freq\t: %d\n"
- "batt_status\t: %s\n",
- (rtc_control & RTC_PIE) ? "yes" : "no",
- (rtc_control & RTC_UIE) ? "yes" : "no",
- is_hpet_enabled() ? "yes" : "no",
- // (rtc_control & RTC_SQWE) ? "yes" : "no",
- (rtc_control & RTC_DM_BINARY) ? "no" : "yes",
- (rtc_control & RTC_DST_EN) ? "yes" : "no",
- cmos->rtc->irq_freq,
- (valid & RTC_VRT) ? "okay" : "dead");
+ seq_printf(seq,
+ "periodic_IRQ\t: %s\n"
+ "update_IRQ\t: %s\n"
+ "HPET_emulated\t: %s\n"
+ // "square_wave\t: %s\n"
+ "BCD\t\t: %s\n"
+ "DST_enable\t: %s\n"
+ "periodic_freq\t: %d\n"
+ "batt_status\t: %s\n",
+ (rtc_control & RTC_PIE) ? "yes" : "no",
+ (rtc_control & RTC_UIE) ? "yes" : "no",
+ is_hpet_enabled() ? "yes" : "no",
+ // (rtc_control & RTC_SQWE) ? "yes" : "no",
+ (rtc_control & RTC_DM_BINARY) ? "no" : "yes",
+ (rtc_control & RTC_DST_EN) ? "yes" : "no",
+ cmos->rtc->irq_freq,
+ (valid & RTC_VRT) ? "okay" : "dead");
+
+ return 0;
}

#else
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c
index 129add77..12b0715 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1305.c
@@ -434,9 +434,9 @@ static int ds1305_proc(struct device *dev, struct seq_file *seq)
}

done:
- return seq_printf(seq,
- "trickle_charge\t: %s%s\n",
- diodes, resistors);
+ seq_printf(seq, "trickle_charge\t: %s%s\n", diodes, resistors);
+
+ return 0;
}

#else
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mrst.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mrst.c
index e2436d1..ab02bda 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mrst.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mrst.c
@@ -277,13 +277,15 @@ static int mrst_procfs(struct device *dev, struct seq_file *seq)
valid = vrtc_cmos_read(RTC_VALID);
spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock);

- return seq_printf(seq,
- "periodic_IRQ\t: %s\n"
- "alarm\t\t: %s\n"
- "BCD\t\t: no\n"
- "periodic_freq\t: daily (not adjustable)\n",
- (rtc_control & RTC_PIE) ? "on" : "off",
- (rtc_control & RTC_AIE) ? "on" : "off");
+ seq_printf(seq,
+ "periodic_IRQ\t: %s\n"
+ "alarm\t\t: %s\n"
+ "BCD\t\t: no\n"
+ "periodic_freq\t: daily (not adjustable)\n",
+ (rtc_control & RTC_PIE) ? "on" : "off",
+ (rtc_control & RTC_AIE) ? "on" : "off");
+
+ return 0;
}

#else
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c
index d948277..b318017 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c
@@ -261,7 +261,9 @@ static int tegra_rtc_proc(struct device *dev, struct seq_file *seq)
if (!dev || !dev->driver)
return 0;

- return seq_printf(seq, "name\t\t: %s\n", dev_name(dev));
+ seq_printf(seq, "name\t\t: %s\n", dev_name(dev));
+
+ return 0:
}

static irqreturn_t tegra_rtc_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
--
2.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/