Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel/audit: consolidate handling of mm->exe_file
From: Paul Moore
Date: Sun Feb 22 2015 - 08:14:45 EST
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 08:45 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 22:23 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
>> >> I'd prefer if the audit_log_d_path_exe() helper wasn't a static inline.
>> > What do you have in mind?
>> Pretty much what I said before, audit_log_d_path_exe() as a
>> traditional function and not an inline. Put the function in
> well yes I know that, which is why I showed you the code sizes. Now
> again, do you have any reason? This function will only get less bulky in
> the future.
The code size was pretty negligible from my point of view, not enough
to outweigh my preference for a non-inlined version of the function.
Also, I expect this function will be one of the things that gets
shuffled/reworked in the coming months as we make some architectural
changes to audit.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/